Talk:Psychosocial (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Redirect[edit]

This song is not notable. Per WP:MUSIC#SONGS, "Most songs do not merit an article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for a prominent album or for the artist who wrote or prominently performed the song. Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable."

Belief that the song will be notable at some point in the future is not a valid reason for an article.

If, at some point in the future, the song becomes notable, give it an article then.

Mdsummermsw (talk) 16:56, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a single not a song, I thought singles were notable? Blackngold29 19:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah and you may call it predicting but EVERY single by the band has been in the charts as a lot of them have been nominated for awards so according to WP:MUSIC "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts.... that have won significant awards or honors... are probably notable" because I'm sure it will. But I don't see the big deal about posting it now, why else would the {{future single}} template exist? REZTER TALK ø 19:21, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Singles are songs that have been released. See WP:MUSIC#SONGS. If/when it charts, it will be notable. Why the category? For the few singles that are notable before they are released, like Moving Mountains (song) and High Price. Most songs are not notable, even after they are released. Please direct any other discussion to AfD. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:53, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First/Second single[edit]

Jsut wanted to poitn out that Roadrunner Records has said that it is their second single... source. Also All Hope Is Gone (song) charted in the UK, which declares it as a single so shouldn't these two articles reflect as such? REZTER TALK ø 01:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ya know what? This whole single thing is out of control and you do have a reliable source. So what the hell? I officially declare that I have no problem with "All Hope is Gone" being called the first single and "Psychosocial" the second single. Blackngold29 01:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genre[edit]

This is clearly a nu metal song, and unless there are objections, it will be reclassified as such.Salex1093 (talk) 17:18, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You need a reliable third party source to back that up. Blackngold29 17:20, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The listed "source" for it being heavy metal doesn't mention the genre, so the classification of heavy metal is no more accurate. Salex1093 (talk) 17:27, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, but Amazon lists it as Metal. "Heavy metal" is a very wide range which includes nu metal. If you want to call it anything, including "nu metal", you need a source. Blackngold29 17:42, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough.Salex1093 (talk) 17:46, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Video[edit]

Says something about it being shocking, but not why. Describe the video plOx PXK T /C 02:05, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was unsourced and POV, removed. Blackngold29 02:44, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, but can someone actually describe the video? PXK T /C 20:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About the "breakdown"[edit]

Rolling Stone praised the song, saying that it "slows down the tempo to bludgeon with a steady, pounding groove instead of all-out thrash in a manner reminiscent of the band's more slow-burning but still malicious second album, Iowa." They went on to explain, "That track is capped off with a time-signature shattering guitar/drum breakdown that will leave the best air-instrumentalists stumped."
Whilst I agree that it is a matter of an opinion, the section in question isn't as "time-signature breaking" as the magazine claims it to be; it follows a simple 5+5+6/16 beat (or 5+6+5/16) that repeats 4 times (at least in the video-edit version), played in the same tempo as the rest of the song.
Just thought I'd bring that up; that section was bugging me a bit (especially when there are much more time-signature shattering songs than Psychosocial.)
~~NaN 21:34, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Summary[edit]

Someone put the line "Psychosocial was on All Hope Is Gone, released august 26" this is stupid to have the album date listed before the single release date. i took it out, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.84.217.249 (talk) 05:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Time[edit]

Okay wtf some dumbass decided that the album length was 4:42, but the song length is 3:38. Occording to several sites, including itunes, that it is 4:42. I will modify. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.84.217.249 (talk) 05:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The length of the single may differ from the length of the album version of the song. I can't confirm the time of the former, can anyone else? blackngold29 05:55, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nu metal?[edit]

There isn't a source for nu metal and alternative metal. So thus, I took it off. You may add it when you have a source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.214.78 (talk) 22:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Psychosocial (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Psychosocial (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Psychosocial (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:09, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead and Rhythm Guitar[edit]

Watching live performances of the song, it doesn't appear that there is any designated lead and rhythm part since both Mick Thomson and Jim Root get a solo and throughout the rest of the song they are playing the same part. Should the personnel just be listed as guitar (and the first and second solo part)? HGP7 (talk) 19:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Psychosocial_(song)&oldid=1209811879"