Talk:RAAF Base Williamtown

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Aviation / Air sports (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 
 
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Air sports project.
WikiProject Australia / New South Wales / Military history (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon RAAF Base Williamtown is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (marked as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (marked as Low-importance).
 
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for other than editorial assistance.

Should this article be split?[edit]

Should this article be split into an article about the commercial airport and an article about the air base (as with Canberra Airport and RAAF Fairbairn), or should it be left as it is? - Adz 12:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

    • I vote for splitting this into two articles. --Nick Dowling 11:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Agreed Should be 2 different articles--Looper5920 00:04, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Split. For the record, I think that it should be split too, but I thought it was worth asking the question. -- Adz|talk 00:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
    • I also vote for splitting it into two articles. Callumm 11:08, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
    • I see no need to split, but do see that the convention is for a split. Interesting that Darwin International Airport and RAAF Base Darwin contain different stuff. One has the infobox with runway lengths, the other info about runways being available for space shuttles without quantifying the length. (no vote either way). If split, can either article ever become featured without having to merge again? --Scott Davis Talk 13:57, 25 January 2006 (UTC)