Talk:Rape in China

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Xijing17.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Rape in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancy of statistics[edit]

The differences between the statistics in this article are so *staggeringly huge*, that I think it needs some more context to be useful at all. As stated in the introduction, the U.S. Department of State reported 31,833 rapes. But extrapolating from the "9.3% of men had raped a woman in the last year" claim from the Multi-country Study on Men and Domestic Violence below gives us at least one thousand times that number, at tens of millions of rapes every year. Either the differences between the methodologies should be clearly stated, or the discrepancy of the results should be commented on in the introduction. Ornilnas (talk) 13:26, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is heavily politicized. I attempted to remove certain parts and improve the wording to be more correct, but it's nearly entirely garbage and should be rewritten to focus on relevant statistics rather than anecdotes, which are almost never included in better-maintained articles about foreign law.

Cleanup[edit]

This article is heavily politicized. I attempted to remove certain parts and improve the wording to be more correct, but it's nearly entirely garbage and should be rewritten to focus on relevant statistics rather than anecdotes, which are almost never included in better-maintained articles about foreign law.

AlbertOfWords (talk) 08:49, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You whitewashed the shit out of it... I will be restoring, looks well sourced and relevant to me. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:13, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]