Talk:Rocketdyne H-1

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rocketdyne H-1 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Rocketry Low‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merging[edit]

RS-27 is essentially a rebranded and uprated H-1 with a pair of additional vernier engines. The difference is comparable to that of NK-33 family of engines, which include NK-15 and AJ-62 (recertified NK-33 at 108% thrust with gimballing mechanism). And both the engines are no longer in production so the size of the new article will not grow significantly. PSR B1937+21 (talk) 00:04, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rocketdyne H-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How did U.S. acquire these engines?[edit]

"During the war, North American Aviation (NAA) was given several 59,600 lbf (264.9 kN)[3] V-2 engines..." Did Germany provide them? Partridgefoot (talk) 02:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it was during the war, as the US and Germany were fighting each other. Most likely it was part of Operation Paperclip after the war. - BilCat (talk) 03:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vacuum thrust missing[edit]

Does anyone have a value for the vacuum thrust of this engine to add to the infobox? Point of Presence talk 11:52, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]