This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
If Saratov would be in the mixed or coniferous forest the first mention to Saratov as its possible location, one would agree, but, but... Please delete and start with much reliable Tatar settlement. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 20:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I had also been considering reverting the two edits by Guzikov96, the article had indeed been badly messed up. At the same time I was reluctant, because it seemed to me this person had put up a great effort, meriting at least a word of appreciation. The dilemma was solved for me by people less delicate... using the word vandalism shows poor respect for an honest if little succesful effort. At the very least I should like to advise Guzikov96 be not too much disappointed, and I recommend to try again, adding the additional data a little bit at a time, so that others could come to help with spelling and structuring. And of course one can always ask for help. Jan olieslagers (talk) 20:10, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
I think the changes had caused too much confusion to be easily fixed by editing; but you are right, I should not have used the word "vandalism" in my edit summary. I have left a welcome message and a few words of advice on his talk page. JohnCD (talk) 20:41, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, JohnCD, it is nice to agree - especially on a birthday! Jan olieslagers (talk) 20:45, 15 January 2011 (UTC)