Talk:Snow White (disambiguation)

Not NPOV

Unusual to see NPOV issues on a disambiguation page, but look at the entry for Operation Snow White. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Igodard (talk • contribs) 17:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

What links here suggests that the movie article should be the primary meaning. Georgia guy 22:42, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose -- Snow White is at least as important. Swapping this article here and Snow White (disambiguation) would be okay, though. Kusma (討論) 23:25, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose If anyone who intends to go to the film article gets here, it's only one click away. And this page gives links to the other articles. This is as it should be --Janke | Talk 09:40, 10 December 2005 (UTC).[reply]
- Oppose. As it should be. Gene Nygaard 17:36, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think that this page should be moved to Snow White (disambiguation) and then redirect Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs to Snow White.—jiy (talk) 19:18, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think that's what I wanted to say. Seems to be the best option. Kusma (討論) 19:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
OPPOSE why would the film be most prevalent? The fairy tale should be more widely known. 132.205.45.148 22:04, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The fairy tale, IMO, is known primarily as simply Snow White. Georgia guy 22:41, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Result

It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved.

(request was to move from Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs to Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (disambiguation))WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 17:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Snow White (disambiguation) redirect

Snow White (disambiguation) links here, which worked fine before the addition of Snow White design language. The way I see it there are two options:

Swap the redirect and disambiguation (move)
Reinstate Snow White (disambiguation) and link here for all other definitions

From my point of view the first option is the intuitive and uncomplicated one. I'm gonna go with that unless there are other opinions? Arru 18:20, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK I'm a total newbie, I see now that there seems to be pretty good support for this proposed move above. Arru 23:21, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]