This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Is this data particularly encyclopedic? I'm thinking the info needs to be condensed and turned into prose. It's also not sourced. Thoughts? Katr67 17:36, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is encyclopedic by wiki standards, but should be turned into a regular paragraph and sourced. Aboutmovies 19:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done. The watershed council site has a collection of pdf files with all sorts of interesting data about land use, pollution, vegetation, and more. I must zoom off in another direction just now, but I might come back to the pdfs eventually. Or somebody else might. Finetooth (talk) 18:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]