This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Taiwan Travel Act article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Taiwan Relations Act: "The act provides for Taiwan to be treated under U.S. laws the same as "foreign countries, nations, states, governments, or similar entities," thus treating Taiwan as a sub-sovereign foreign state equivalent.". Why would Taiwan be treated as a country in Wikipedia? I propose replace all reference to Taiwan as a country in this article.--The Master (talk) 17:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, this article concerning an act is supposed to reflect the de jure status of Taiwan rather than the de facto one. --Aisakano (talk) 08:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The text of the Taiwan Travel Act actually uses the word "country" in reference to Taiwan. Therefore, "country" would seem to reflect the de jure status, at least within the context of this act. 5. Visits to a country by United States Cabinet members and other high-ranking officials are an indicator of the breadth and depth of ties between the United States and such country.Phlar (talk) 18:34, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
By de jure status, I mean the status that is thoroughly and well defined by law instead of a vague reference alone. --Aisakano (talk) 02:51, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have fixed this in the article. Phlar (talk) 13:32, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
