Talk:The Ethics of Liberty

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature / Ethics / Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy

Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Libertarianism portal The Ethics of Liberty is within the scope of WikiProject Libertarianism, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Libertarianism and related subjects in the Wikipedia. Template Usage • Change Patrol • Articles Requested • Become a Member • Project Talk LibertarianismWikipedia:WikiProject LibertarianismTemplate:WikiProject LibertarianismLibertarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Zwolinski[edit]

"Zwolinski... is a co-director of USD’s Institute for Law and Philosophy, editor of Arguing About Political Philosophy (Routledge, 2009) and author, with John Tomasi, of A Brief History of Libertarianism (forthcoming with Princeton University Press in 2014)." (USD faculty profile.) His association with USD is pertinent and linking his name via the school article link assists readers in finding him. Hence, describing his professional affiliation and linking USD in the article is proper. – S. Rich (talk) 05:01, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Srich32977

I do not find the comments Srich32977 made here to be an acceptable justification of his edit. If Hoppe's university affiliation is relevant, it should be in the article; its being in his Wikipedia here is not a reason why it shouldn't be here also. The other part of his edit summary seems to be saying that Zwolinski's university affiliation is relevant because it suggests that he is a Catholic, the implication being that this is relevant to the quality or validity of his criticism of Rothbard. I don't accept that either. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:01, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps Hoppe can be described with more particularity. He is a Emeritus from UNLV. I have no objection to short descriptions regarding same. My edit summary remark about USD being Catholic is not part of the article. But readers can discover this if they look. – S. Rich (talk) 05:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Ethics of Liberty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070312011942/http://www.fee.org:80/publications/the-freeman/article.asp?aid=3826 to http://www.fee.org/publications/the-freeman/article.asp?aid=3826

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]