Talk:The King of Fighters '95

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

List of Minecraft characters (4 participants)
Carlton Wilborn (4 participants)
Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (3 participants; relisted)
TheoTown (12 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Sun Haven

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Art of Fighting#Eiji Kisaragi|Eiji Kisaragi]] The anchor (Eiji Kisaragi) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://web.archive.org/web/20240906204720/https://www.gematsu.com/2024/09/aca-neogeo-selection-vol-1-and-2-announced-for-switch

I think it's wrong to put in the article KOF 95 is the beginning of Orochi Saga, for Orochi or his henchmen were not behind the Rugal's evil plan, which was to turn the fighters into Cyber-Assassins. Besides, the name Orochi is only mentioned at Iori team's ending. I think KOF 95, along with KOF 94, belongs to Rugal Saga.Brazilian Man 20:33, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As of yet, all of the KOF sagas have been 3 parts, excluding the Rugal Saga. Until the point that one is less or more than this 3 part setup, 95 should be considered as part of the Orochi saga, no matter how different it is from 96 and 97, nor how it barely starts it off. Not only that, in the new Orochi Saga compilation (The King of Fighters Collection: The Orochi Saga), 95 is included. Ekkusu 13:54, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The King of Fighters '95. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6aoVqw6Ia?url=http://www.1up.com/features/history-ofthe-king-fighters to http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3112498
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamespot.com/ps/action/kingoffighters95/review.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.japan-gamecharts.com/sat.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]