A fact from United States Post Office (Nyack, New York) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 September 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The article reads, "Treasury began preferring the newer Colonial Revival style for its post offices", but the Post Office Department was independent (and thus not in the Treasury) since the founding of the U.S. federal government. The Treasury owned no post offices. This could be rewritten, at least to clarify it...
--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 01:05, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Treasury was in charge of building all the post offices, and many other government buildings. Will clarify. Daniel Case (talk) 01:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Since the post office was renamed (in memory of Brinks robbery (1981) victims), should the article name not reflect that change? -M.Nelson (talk) 02:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of post offices get renamed in this "official" yet symbolic way. It's never put on the front of the building, nobody uses it in conversation, therefore it's not the common name that we're supposed to prefer. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Classical Revival architectural style, a mode rarely used for American post offices between the wars. This may simply register unfamiliarity with Classical style, which includes neo-Colonial and neo-Georgian styles, or with the history. Few post offices between the wars were erected in other alternatives, like international modern style, art deco or in neo-Gothic It would be hard to identify a US post office 1918-40 not in classical style. I pointed this out at DYK, so the insistence here is puzzling.--Wetman (talk) 03:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Because it was disputed there when you did, that's why. Most post offices between the wars used that strict red brick Colonial Revival form (sometimes with cupola and weathervane), restricting themselves to those neoclassical aspects used in Colonial buildings. This one didn't, using the more contemporary neoclassical vocabulary (and yellow brick). Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
