Talk:Westmorland County, New Brunswick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rename[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:22, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Westmorland County, New BrunswickWestmorland, Nova Scotia – The name should reflect the single name like Halifax, Nova Scotia ,Queens, Nova Scotia, Argyle, Nova Scotia, West Hants, Nova Scotia, St. Mary's, Nova Scotia, Guysborough, Nova Scotia, East Hants, Nova Scotia and Clare, Nova Scotia Easternhfx (talk) 18:43, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. It's becoming very clear that editor is being disruptive to make a point. He's upset over a change to the article title for Halifax Regional Municipality and is making it a point to propose name changes for a large number of other article because of this. Since this is a New Brunswick article, it appears he's now targeting articles outside of Nova Scotia also. Cmr08 (talk) 18:51, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This proposal should be taken down all-together, it makes no sense to even discuss moving a New Brunswick article to Nova Scotia. Cmr08 (talk) 20:37, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Cmr08 and other opposes on parallel RMs. These are all a waste of time and should be shut down forthwith.Skookum1 (talk) 06:08, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. First of all, this article is not even in Nova Scotia, second, counties anywhere in the world include the word County, communities do not. This article would then indicate it was a community. This user should understand this before proposing this change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hogie75 (talkcontribs) 21:29, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Ridiculous. -DJSasso (talk) 03:02, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Djsasso et al. I believe a time-out for said user would be in order. Regards, Aloha27 (talk) 23:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.