Talk:Zarch

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Those missile things?[edit]

At the side of the launchpad are three or four structures which look like missiles. I understood these to be fuel silos; destruction of them means that the player cannot refuel the lander. However, my memory may be lacking! Can anyone confirm? Preacherdoc 10:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)Preacherdoc.[reply]

Refuelling still works after destroying all three of them. No idea what they mean. 130.83.244.129 18:12, 30 Jul 2006
I seem to remember that the player could launch these missiles to automatically clear an area of the map of nasties. Hence the missile display at the top of the screen, too. Unfortunately I don't have a version to test this with. Cpc464 14:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Something worth mentioning[edit]

As a big of trivia, Future Publishing's 'ACE' magazine awarded the game a perfect 1000/1000 review score. Might be worth mentioning in the article.

Not true. Zarch was rated 979 (ACE issue 3, page 61).--84.177.88.62 (talk) 19:55, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Landerscreenshot.gif[edit]

Image:Landerscreenshot.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Virus (video game)[edit]

If Virus is simply the name for Zarch on other platforms, there's really no case for having separate pages, as it's just the same thing under a different name. I suggest they be merged. Ubcule (talk) 15:06, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair comment In that case, think it could really do with the box artwork for the original Zarch being added. Unfortunately I don't have it, so can't do so myself. --trevj (talk) 14:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done [1] Some tidying remains but at least the content's all in one place now. --Trevj (talk) 14:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence that Braben coded the ST and Amiga versions?[edit]

ACE magazine (issue 2) said that the Argonaut programming team led by Jez San did the Amiga and ST conversions of Zarch. Where's the evidence that it was in fact Braben who did it? Also, Zarch was never renamed to Virus. Braben's project had always been called Virus, but Acorn had a say in the Archimedes release and wanted it to be called Zarch for obvious reasons. --84.177.88.62 (talk) 19:39, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done That's changed but if you can add details to the porting ref, please do (there seems to be no relevant discussion at Talk:Virus (video game)). I also think you're right with the name too: the interview in The Micro User states Rather unfortunately, in my opinion, Acorn registered the name Zarch (sounds like a soap powder) which I agreed to stay with on the Archimedes computers. However, the game may be appearing, in a slightly inferior form, on the Commodore Amiga and perhaps the Atari ST under a different name (not STarch). --Trevj (talk) 02:31, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of the name[edit]

I wonder why it was called Zarch. Just speculation: could it be z for a three-dimensional third axis, plus Arch for Archimedes? 82.113.133.21 (talk) 09:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zarch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Zarch&oldid=1213469191"