Template:Did you know nominations/Maha Sammata

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 16:42, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Maha Sammata[edit]

Created/expanded by Hybernator (talk). Self nom at 00:35, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

  • New enough, long enough, with interesting and neutral hook. However, I see a number of problems. The hook does not quite agree with the statement in the article - it says that Maha Sammata was 'elected', but the article merely says that he was 'chosen'. Since there are other ways to choose someone than electing them, the hook is not, IMO, fully supported. Secondly, the inline citation for the hook is incomplete, and lacks information on the source, stating only the author's surname and the year of publication. This is not sufficient to unambiguously identify and verify the source. Finally, although it is not strictly part of the DYK criteria, IMO, the article needs copyediting for grammar and clarity. Anaxial (talk) 07:42, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
On further examination, the citations complete, but incorrectly formatted (that is, the name of the book was used as if it were the surname of the author in the inline section, but not in the bibliography, so the two didn't match). I've fixed this myself, but the other issues remain outstanding. Anaxial (talk) 11:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. (Kapferer 1997: 68) uses both "chose" and "elect". Anyway, just to be clear, I've changed the inline text to "elected", and added a citation for it. You can check out the citation here: [1]. Also did additional copy-editing. Please review again. Thanks. Hybernator (talk) 00:09, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Okay, that looks good to go now. Anaxial (talk) 05:56, 26 September 2012 (UTC)