Template:Did you know nominations/Melati van Agam

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 23:54, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Melati van Agam

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the titular character of Jasmine of Agam, a noble's daughter, was compared to a prostitute?

• Reviewed: Sagaan Ubgen

Created/expanded by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 06:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Article looks fine, but it is an extremly boring hook, can anything else be found? Such as about it being lost? — M.Mario (T/C) 10:19, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

• I rather like the contrast between nobility and (implied) prostitution, and lost films are sadly common.

• ALT1: ... that a reviewer considered the flaws in Jasmine of Agam so obvious "even the stupidest villager" could spot them?

How's that? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:00, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

- But why have you put Jasmine of Agam, and not the real title? — M.Mario (T/C) 14:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

• The film guys insist on English titles, but here's one with the original: ALT2 ... that a reviewer considered the flaws in Melati van Agam so obvious "even the stupidest villager" could spot them? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

• FWIW, I believe opinion is moving away from the insistence on English titles; the number of films passing GA/FA with their original titles unchallenged is a good indication of this. GRAPPLE X 05:25, 25 August 2012 (UTC)