Template:Did you know nominations/Multicoloured Tanager

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 09:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Multicoloured Tanager[edit]

5x expanded by Conbio336 (talk). Self nominated at 20:09, 27 March 2015 (UTC).

  • The article was nominated within days of a sufficient expansion. The entire article is well-covered by citations. The photograph is the author's own work. Grammar and style checks out, and the hook is decent too. There is, however, a slight problem with failed verification. The citation #5, one of the two I can access, does not appear to mention any sexual dimporhism (or females at all). Am I missing something? If it is not my fault, I would like someone with access to the other sources to verify the rest of the article and the hook. Conbio336 is a relatively new user, so I cannot pass it on the AGF principle. Surtsicna (talk) 22:43, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I've fixed the citation, it wasn't the proper one! Thanks for spotting in! Conbio336 (talk) 21:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Conbio336
  • The faulty citation has been dealt with and this article meets the other DYK criteria and I think it is ready to go. Although I have no more access than Surtsicna to the offline sources, I find the sources that I can access are used in a satisfactory manner in the article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)