Template talk:Did you know/Hybrid Scorecard

Hybrid Scorecard[edit]

Promoted by Sharktopus

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Sharktopus ^talk

... that the Union of Concerned Scientists created a Hybrid Scorecard to provide consumers a comprehensive comparison of hybrid electric vehicles available in the U.S. market?

Created/expanded by Mariordo (talk) at 02:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Length, format, content rules: Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source: Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest: ... not very interesting... Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability: None. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT hooks, if proposed:

Article

Length: Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage: Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality: Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: Problems. This and especially this show major cut and paste action. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio: Images are fine. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting:

Comments/discussion:

No. Needs a total rewrite to eliminate cut and paste, as well as close paraphrasing. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator has expressed interest in rewriting the offending bits. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:37, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paraphrasing seems to have been improved. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:49, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]