Template talk:Did you know/List of posthumous number-one singles (UK)

List of posthumous number-one singles (UK)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know, unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle}

... that in 2005 Elvis Presley achieved three posthumous number-one hits on the UK Singles Chart as part of a record company campaign to mark his 70th birthday?

Comment: created in sandbox yesterday, moved to mainspace today

Created by ChrisTheDude (talk). Self nom at 19:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Length, format, content rules: 242 ch., over the 200 limit. The "what would have been" could be removed? Tony (talk) 01:38, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Done, although a character count in Word reveals that even the longer version was under 200 characters??!! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--Epipelagic (talk) 05:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source: --Epipelagic (talk) 05:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest: --Epipelagic (talk) 05:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability:
ALT hooks, if proposed:

Article

Length: --Epipelagic (talk) 05:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage: --Epipelagic (talk) 05:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): --Epipelagic (talk) 05:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality: --Epipelagic (talk) 05:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: --Epipelagic (talk) 05:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio: --Epipelagic (talk) 05:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting: --Epipelagic (talk) 05:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments/discussion:

Okay to go --Epipelagic (talk) 05:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]