User:Alchemist Jack/narwhalsandbox

Hi, I'm Alchemist Jack. I'd like to personally welcome you and thank you for your contributions thus far. As you probably know, Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia collaboratively written entirely by volunteers. If you ever see anything that can be improved—be it correcting a typo or writing a new article—don't be afraid to fix it yourself! Don't worry about making mistakes; one of the many editors will probably notice and quickly correct it. If you have any questions, just place the text {{helpme}} on your talk page, and an administrator will help you shortly. Alternatively, you could join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC channel, where dozens of friendly helpers await. You can find out more about the project here, but I won't bore you with statistics and rules. Just remember to be civil to other editors, to always cite your sources, and to write articles from a neutral point of view, and you should be good to go.

Wikipedia is a huge website; with 6,823,537 articles, it is the single biggest encyclopedia in the world. Additionally, there are thousands of policy and process pages, so it can be a bit overwhelming, even to experienced users. Other people have found the Tutorial particularly helpful. A good place to practice is on your userspace You might also want to check out the glossary. This page serves as our library reference desk, where you can ask nearly any question imaginable.

The Featured Articles and Good Article pages are good places to look for some of our most well-written and comprehensive articles. On the other end of the spectrum, we have thousands of articles that require cleanup of some sort, so feel free to help out. In particular, many biographies of living persons need to be sourced properly; while this task can be a bit difficult, it's of a highly important nature. If you fancy a challenge you could join the Article Rescue Squadron.

I hope you've found this advice helpful. Feel free to contact me for more information.

It is often considered the first fully realized science fiction novel due to its pointed, if gruesome, focus on playing God by creating life from dead flesh. Based on this defininition surely the Bible is the first fully realized science fiction story as it starts with God (playing himself) creating a man from dust. /navy

[1] [2]

2+This user has made more than 2 contributions to Wikipedia.

Alchemists

There are distinct problems when discussing Alchemy

• The Alchemist were secretive. They were involved with subjects that could get you into trouble; conversing with spirits, manufacture of talismans, accusations of sorcery, poisoning, currency forgery. Not only is this activity religiously dubious it could also be politically suspect. And/Or they are taking drugs, either directly or indirectly through handling/fumes, some of which were likely to have given them visions (or what might now be called hallucinations). Strange Fruit makes a case that Alchemist were a underground mushroom cult. This at first glance looks ridiculous but his evidence is actually quite compelling. Suddenly, images like Hermaphrodite with egg become "readable". The rebus -White skinned lady lovinly joined with red-limbed husband- standing one-legged musroom fashion beneath a fir tree, the "egg" held in the lunar hand, and the visible portion of the "egg" outline a mushroom. The red and white wings and golden belt showing a maturing Fly Agaric. The solar hand holding a dried cap with a vision of another world reflecting in its surface. I know its just one picture and a lot of coincedences, but the book is much more comprehensive and better argued.
• They were, as you say, Philosophers meaning that the activity they were involved in crossed, what are now, clearly defined areas of activity. It was practical and speculative. Science, psuedo-science and art combined. Modern readers cannot understand how Alchemist thought or acted without veiwing them through the lens of rational thinking, and that fails to explain Alchemy. Therefore the Alchemist were deluded quacks. The beyond rationality aspect of Alchemy explains the contribution of the Jungians et al.
• There is no central Alchemy authority, rather different strands and flavours cross-pollinating each other. Meanings were multi-layered, an image could mean a (cultural reference) b (mystical symbol) x (physical substance), y (speculative substance), z (emotional state) and q, k, w (unknown).

The flavour of goat meat is said to be primarly linked to 4-methyloctanoic and 4-methylnonanoic acid.

congrats you got my

You do good stuff

I haven't got anything else to give you but this

 Good luck in all your endeavours. 

--Alchemist Jack (talk) 02:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

unsourced ranting innuendo or unsourcuendo

some dinner table

Dogs	Cats	Mice
row 1, cell 1	row 1, cell 2	row 1, cell 3
row 2, cell 1	row 2, cell 2	row 2, cell 3

Bulwer was a beliver in the Divine Touch which he mentions.

Motist?

[3]

It is just an example

The best way

this is the best way to write all articles on wikipedia.^{citation needed}