User talk:115.66.203.56

March 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Jeff G.. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Cofactor have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 01:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tosa Mitsunobu, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Tōkai earthquakes does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 00:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to Furnace. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (115.66.203.56) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 13:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Your recent editing history at Emperor of Japan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 04:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Naruhito, Crown Prince of Japan[edit]

Will you please STOP changing the info. The era starts the day after the succession. See Akihito, who reign began on January 7, 1989 while his era began on January 8, 1989. GoodDay (talk) 16:30, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Akihito Era started the next day because Emperor Hirohito died on 7 January. Naruhito suceed because of Akihito's abdication, not means of death. From to source: "Japan’s next Imperial era, which is set to begin on May 1, 2019, the day after the Emperor abdicates."

Do you have a source that says Akihito's abdication will occur at mid-night? Death & abdication are the same in that it ends a reign. GoodDay (talk) 16:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ALL Japanese eras begin the day AFTER the reign begins. It doesn't matter if the predecessor dies or abdicates. GoodDay (talk) 16:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then can you explain what this sentence mean? "Japan’s next Imperial era, which is set to begin on May 1, 2019, the day after the Emperor abdicates." From https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/12/02/business/economy-business/japanese-firms-preparing-new-calendar-era-following-emperors-abdication-2019/

You're not Listening. The reign begins BEFORE the era begins. See Akihito, his reign began January 7, 1989 but his era began January 8, 1989. GoodDay (talk) 16:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I missed your comments. I think there is confusion on Naruhito's acession date on articles. Unless Akihito immediately abdictes at midnight and Naruhito acession date starts on the same day as the Era?

The exact timing of the abdication hasn't been shown in any sources. I'd suggest we simply mention Akihito's abdication being April 30. GoodDay (talk) 16:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. But I think it's most likely to presume that Akihito will abdicate by Midnight according to most sources. Article from Nikkei: https://asia.nikkei.com/Life-Arts/Life/Japan-ponders-Imperial-succession-for-modern-times

"Crown Prince Naruhito will accede to the throne the following day, at which point the current Heisei era will end and a new one yet to be named will begin."

We don't have a source the gives the exact timing (to the second) of the abdication, so we can't say Naruhito will accede the throne the 'same' day or the 'following' day. GoodDay (talk) 17:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/12/01/national/emperors-abdication-date-confirmed-april-30-2019/#.WiLnf8vmjqA

"Suga added it is “theoretically possible” that the switch into a new era will not coincide with Crown Prince Naruhito’s rise to the throne on May 1, 2019. However, his assertion that the government will minimize public confusion suggests such a scenario is unlikely."

Agree. Likely, we'll have to wait for the Cabinet's decision on the time.

December 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Philroc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Steve Aoki, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Phil roc^{My contribs} 18:20, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

115.66.203.56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not understand why I was blocked? I made a checkuser request for a likely sock and got banned? You see my past history do not involve vandalism or disruptive editing.

Decline reason:

Given that this is a CheckUser block, it appears that you are evading a previous block. CheckUsers generally do not connect accounts and IP addresses in public. I suggest you request to be unblocked at your account's user talk page. Huon (talk) 14:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.