User talk:14.139.69.34

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bishuddhananda Puorkait (January 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Orduin was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. -- Orduin Discuss 00:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note, I also marked it with a speedy deletion since you have blanked it.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bishuddhananda Purokait (February 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Missvain (talk) 06:25, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! 14.139.69.34, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 06:25, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bishuddhananda Purokait[edit]

Hello, 14.139.69.34. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Bishuddhananda Purokait".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 00:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Bennv123. I noticed that you recently removed content from Adam and Eve without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bennv123 (talk) 11:43, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the content there. The matter is presented as if supporting the view that scientific opinion validates the creation myth. It needs to be either removed or clearly explained what it means by having a mitochondrial Eve. Someone unaware of it would by default assume that Science has found proof for Adam and Eve. 14.139.69.34 (talk) 11:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You'll have to discuss your concerns/proposed changes at Talk:Adam and Eve. But I think the section already clarfies that this is not the same as the creation myth ("These do not fork from a single couple at the same epoch even though the names were borrowed from the Tanakh."). Bennv123 (talk) 12:02, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Adam and Eve, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. The information is true as we still developed from a common ancestor Nagol0929 (talk) 11:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Indian student organisations. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:38, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]