User talk:76.116.196.115

July 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to List of Yu-Gi-Oh! Arc-V characters, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 01:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Yu-Gi-Oh! Arc-V characters, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 01:54, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at List of Yu-Gi-Oh! Arc-V characters shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Continued addition of unsourced content, sources must be provided. Read WP:RS and WP:OR Scr★pIron^IV 02:00, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Yu-Gi-Oh! Arc-V[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Yu-Gi-Oh! Arc-V article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 18:49, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Yu-Gi-Oh! Arc-V episodes. Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:28, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:45, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Digifan23. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Digifan23 (talk) 06:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Digifan23 (talk) 07:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reference errors on 26 February[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Kazuya Nakai page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm TheFarix. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 01:22, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Mr. Pickles. Binksternet (talk) 05:22, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Taboo Tattoo. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Farix (t | c) 00:56, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for evading a previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=I'm not able to edit without my IP Address}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:35, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty clear to me that you are the same editor behind the Sage of the Six Paths account. You are not welcome to edit at Wikipedia for as long as that account is blocked. You are free to post an unblock request at that account if you wish, but you're going to need to provide some compelling explanation for your persistently disruptive behavior, as well as convince admins that you are competent to edit here. You should also read directions a little more thoroughly. The unblock request you attempted to fill out here was not done properly. Let me reiterate that while this IP is blocked for 1 month, that does not mean you are welcome to edit here at the end of that month. Your account Sage of the Six Paths has been blocked indefinitely, which means that you are not welcome to edit here indefinitely. Any edit you make while that account is blocked can be reverted by any user for any reason. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:17, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You know what Cyphoidbomb I'm tired of this, your the only person trying to put me down even when I'm trying to make a fresh start. I already know what I was doing is wrong but you are not trying at all to give me a second chance to show you that I'll follow the rules this time. 76.116.196.115 (talk) 18:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You don't get to decide when you want a make a fresh start. Your sockpuppetry, i.e. your self-established fresh starts, were equally as problematic as your original start. I've already told you what option you have. If you choose to ignore that option, that's on you. Oh, and "I already know what I was doing is wrong" should be your cue to stop doing it. And I can't even fathom how you could think that continuing to do something wrong would convince people you can follow the rules. What? Did you actually type that? Jesus. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And what the hell are you god on this site. I swear give people like you some power you get all high and mighty it's sad. Besides your the only one targeting me and I explain myself a bunch of times. You just don't listen simple as that. 76.116.196.115 (talk) 20:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you need another admin to step in and state that you are violating Wikipedia policy through the evasion of your block, I can do so. Cyphoidbomb is not targeting you because of any inherent dislike, they're simply holding you to the requisite policies they were specifically chosen by the community to enforce. Any blocks that you receive are wholly on you as a result of your own actions. You can choose to try to make it appear to be a vendetta, but that will not bring you anywhere closer to an unblock.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:23, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots}, that's why I rather talk this out with you instead. We can do this like gentlemen and get to the bottom line of this at the same time. 76.116.196.115 (talk) 22:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any unblock requests you make need to happen at User talk:Sage of the Six Paths, just like Cyphoidbomb has explained to you. You cannot edit via any account or IP while that block remains in place.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:46, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to once, but Cyphoidbomb never respond again, so I created a new account instead. But if I make a unblock request on User talk:Sage of the Six Paths now let's continue to discuss this. 76.116.196.115 (talk) 22:56, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't respond to your question, because it shifted onto me the unreasonable burden of yet again explaining to you why you were blocked, when I had already explained that in great detail. I also explained explicitly that you were not permitted to create a new account, but you did that anyway, because apparently rules don't apply to you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:25, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And I told you everything that happen and I was really going to change at that point. 76.116.196.115 (talk) 03:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.116.196.115 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can't use my account without the IP Address 76.116.196.115 (talk) 04:50, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We know that. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 04:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

76.116.196.115 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just got my account unblocked and I the IP back as well. 76.116.196.115 (talk) 06:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Done, since your account has been unblocked. Please don't edit while logged out. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

August 2019[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this IP address or network has been used to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse.
If you are not the intended target of this block, please read the information below in order to receive assistance.

Wikipedia tries to be open, but we sometimes must block IP addresses to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. These blocks can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block.

IP users (without an account): If you do not have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. In general, these blocks only prevent users who are not logged in from editing; once you are logged in, the block will no longer affect you in any way. To request an account, simply click here and follow the directions provided on the page. It is important that you use an e-mail address issued to you by your ISP, school, or organisation, so we may verify that you are a legitimate user. When filling out the account request form, please refer to this block in the "comments" input field. If you've been instructed to request an account via email, please refer to this block in your message.

Registered users (with an account): Please make sure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in, you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:46, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.