User talk:Airmario3

This account is a suspected sockpuppet of Marioandluigifan (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

November 2010[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alaska Airlines, you may be blocked from editing. HkCaGu (talk) 04:37, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Narita International Airport, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sb617 (Talk) 01:48, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Template:Oneworld has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles; use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 04:45, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to John Wayne Airport. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. HkCaGu (talk) 04:23, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at YouTube, you may be blocked from editing. –BMRR (talk) 23:55, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Oneworld, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Aviator006 (talk) 20:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Oneworld. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Aviator006 (talk) 20:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Kingfisher Airlines, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Abhishek191288 (talk) 03:15, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You are well aware of the rules of WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT. Please stop doing meaningless edits like adding destinations to an airline that has just been approved to resume operations. It is obvious that they cannot suddenly resume serving all their previous destinations on the same day. HkCaGu (talk) 19:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I'm running out of patience with you, as you disregard what is acceptable in Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports. You cannot source to your own blog. You cannot use government approval absence an airline's announcement to assume the start of a new service. You have your contribution to Wikipedia, but continuing this disruptive behavior cannot and will not be tolerated. You already have previous accounts blocked. HkCaGu (talk)

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:27, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing privileges have been indefinitely suspended[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

The disruption you have created, and the manner in which concerns and complaints are ignored, are too similar to Marioandluigifan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) to allow you to retain your editing privileges. LessHeard vanU (talk) 16:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spongebob/Timmy crossover is false![edit]

Timmy/Spongebob crossover episodes are not going to air on Nickelodeon. I checked the history and a "stupid" user just found out it was a fake episode. Since I can't edit, it's time for you to remove the Timmy/Spongebob Power hour, 1, 2, and 3 flims on the List of films broadcast by Nickelodeon page. (sorry for the language Airmario3) 10:31AM Pacific Time Costa Mesa, USA

Unblock me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Airmario3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is something real important i need to cut out and add in Spongebob episode list and remove false tv films on nickelodeon Airmario3 (talk) 00:03, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 02:20, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Airmario3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can I be unblocked now? It's been 3 months. I won't vandalize anymore. I'll promise to add sources to each sentence. Airmario3 (talk) 16:16, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 16:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have restored the unblock request you deleted. If you continue to delete declined unblock requests, or make invalid ones, you will be blocked from editing this talk page. Sandstein 16:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me 3rd era[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Airmario3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know that vandalizing is wrong, but I am changed now. I love to edit stuff on Wikipedia and there are some stuff i want to edit. Can you please unblock me? Airmario3 (talk) 00:43, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Sockpuppet accounts don't get unblocked. You have not offered any plausible reason for unblocking any account you have. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 04:13, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.