User talk:Alec Mason

Welcome!

Hello, Alec Mason, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Grepolis, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WuhWuzDat 14:16, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:More time as i spent a long time[edit]

Hello Alec Mason, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Although it may have not been your intent, your article, "Plug Studios", read like an advertisement. On Wikipedia, we have a policy in which advertising/spam is subject to on-sight deletion under speedy deletion criterion G11. Of course, you are certainly welcome to resubmit your article, but please ensure that the revised text is compliant with the policies and guidelines described at WP:ADS, WP:MOS, WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:POV, and WP:GNG; otherwise, you run the risk of having the article deleted again. Once you have resubmitted your article, you may find WP:RFF helpful; the WP:RFF noticeboard has many editors who are more than willing to give you constructive criticism on your article and/or help edit your article. If you have any other questions or are in need of assistance, please feel free to let me know. FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:26, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LavaLord...[edit]

... is mere speculation. Wikipedia is not the place for such speculation. He does not belong on the Power Miners page unless there is a specific official source confirming his existence. In that case, instead of simply reverting my edits, actually provide an official source (meaning not some obscure fan website, but something directly from the LEGO company) telling me that this LavaLord exists. This can be summed up in two words: "Citation Needed".

And if that citation is actually leaked 2011 set info, then it's leaked info which LEGO does not want revealed to the public, in which case it should not be put on the page either. --PeabodySam (talk) 23:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Piracy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Τασουλα (Shalom!) (talk) 10:47, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lego. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Τασουλα (Shalom!) (talk) 10:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hornby Track Master[edit]

The article Hornby Track Master has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This Article is an Advert

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]