User talk:Amgray19

MusicNotes.com[edit]

I'm not disputing that the information regarding the specific composition of "Until the End of the World" is not exactly identical to the version that U2. However, I would invite you to take a closer look at a few of Wikipedia's guidelines. Verifiability states that we must include what is verifiable; and while that information is usually correct it can occassionally deviate. The reason for this is because sometimes the full information is not available, so we have to make do with what we have. With respect, it is also because what editors say is right is not always the case. You say that the chord change is different than what the source does, but unless you have personally purchased that linked sheet music you can only see one of thirteen available pages; you haven't really provided any evidence on that point other than your own assertion. Please see also WP:MUSICNOTES, a proposed guideline which asserts that we must provide the exact source when discussing information on composition. As such we have noted in the prose the specific source for this sheet music, which clearly states under the Arrangement Details tab at the bottom "The Arrangement Details Tab gives you detailed information about this particular arrangement of Until The End Of The World - not necessarily the song." This again is where {{WP:V]] comes into play. We have provided all the verifiable information that we can, short of a video from The Edge telling everyone how to play it; and there are, of course, other arrangements available from other sources which may say something entirely different about the key or tempo. Melicans (talk, contributions) 19:28, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not trying to be a pain either; you did not indicate that you had purchased the sheet music in the edit summary (you only said that it was wrong), so I assumed that you were going by the free preview only; and you know what they say, assume makes an 'ass of u and me'! :-) Thanks for clearing it up regardless, and happy editing. Melicans (talk, contributions) 20:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) (August 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Amgray19, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) (August 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 13:01, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC)[edit]

Hello, Amgray19. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Research Administrators Certification Council".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) (November 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Garchy was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Things like "The CFRA designation is currently under consideration for trademark" and having the registered trademark symbol in your article make it sound promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Garchy (talk) 23:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Amgray19, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Garchy (talk) 23:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) (April 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two reasons: first, inadequate proof of notability--listings in directories are not substantial references.Second, it still reads promotionally, with detail that no one outside the group would be concerned with.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 08:31, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC)[edit]

Hello, Amgray19. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Research Administrators Certification Council".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC)[edit]

Hello, Amgray19. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Research Administrators Certification Council".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC)[edit]

Hello, Amgray19. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Research Administrators Certification Council".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Draft:Research_Administrators_Certification_Council_(RACC)[edit]

Hello Amgray19 I have added projects Science, Education, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 01:11, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research Administrators Certification Council (December 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

K.e.coffman (talk) 01:48, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is very frustrating. I have worked very hard to address all past advice given to me to cite available literature on this topic. I have referenced every possible literature source that is available. It's rather interesting that there is an allowed page for one of the exams referenced in the draft of this page (the CRA exam), but the actual body that created the exam is not allowed to be included as an article. I would love some feedback to help, if possible. Amgray19 (talk) 18:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is anyone going to address this? This makes three times asking for reconsideration. There are way more ridiculous items allowed on Wikipedia, and an organization that is important to tens of thousands of research administrators should be considered "notable." Amgray19 (talk) 18:14, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council[edit]

Hello, Amgray19. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Research Administrators Certification Council".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 08:15, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council[edit]

Hello, Amgray19. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Research Administrators Certification Council".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]