User talk:Arsalan Kiani

Arsalan Kiani, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

The

Adventure

Hi Arsalan Kiani!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of warning templates[edit]

Hello, Arsalan. You shouldn't post warning templates on experienced users, as you did on User talk:Thomas.W, that's just silly. Use your own words if you have a genuine concern. Furthermore, the warnings are designed as a series — uw-unsourced, uw-unsourced2 uw-unsourced3, etc. Posting the first warning, the second warning, and the "last warning" all in a bunch together negates the whole idea of a progression of warnings, and approaches harassment. Especially since you obviously posted them in retaliation for the templates Thomas posted to you. Just stop, please. Wikipedia is not a battleground. Bishonen | talk 09:40, 16 October 2015 (UTC).[reply]

October 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing. This edit, which replaced Thomas's signature with your own (!) is completely unacceptable, and so is this unfounded retaliatory accusation. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 09:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for not being here to create an encyclopedia. I see you also removed a vandalism report against yourself here. That's the last straw. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 10:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal this block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arsalan Kiani (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i make a some mistakes my contributions edit here unblock and i was new wikipedians i did't know an edit can block me now what can i do so that i will be unblock

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 23:43, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Did you really expect that the unblock form, to which you linked under the guise of "edit", doesn't require confirmation and we will accidentally unblock you? Max Semenik (talk) 09:10, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove discussion related to your current block, or you will lose the ability to edit this page. Max Semenik (talk) 14:41, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]