User talk:Bell beakerman

Bell beakerman, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bell beakerman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:19, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Pictish language, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:20, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Removals without evidence

Today you removed large, sourced parts of two articles. You did this without any serious explanation or evidence. I have reverted one article and somebody else the other.

I know that you are passionate but please, do not do this again. The Banner talk 19:07, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Haplogroup R1b. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 17:20, 7 June 2019 (UTC)