User talk:Bubble Dodlon

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Bubble Dodlon, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Category:The Tцrdful donald trump Is A Steenky naziTцrd And Now Is GONE With A THUD! Now It'S Your Turn bolsonaroTцrd and borishjtjohnsonTцrd, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:11, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Tцrdful donald trump Is A Steenky naziTцrd And Now Is GONE With A THUD! Now It'S Your Turn bolsonaroTцrd and borishjtjohnsonTцrd[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Category:The Tцrdful donald trump Is A Steenky naziTцrd And Now Is GONE With A THUD! Now It'S Your Turn bolsonaroTцrd and borishjtjohnsonTцrd, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
It is an "attack page". (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:11, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Category:Trump–Ukraine scandal—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:13, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plos of into unblockings me cuz i need of wandolizings and after i will are of politest and new admin candidate to be the politest admin and after to ban anybody and became the emperor of thuz site mwahwahwah![edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bubble Dodlon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Plos of into of movings of unbannings me i need of have to into wandolyzings ovah and ovah again or i will be into nothappinessings and after i will be bestest admin evur and kickban anybody to reign forever mwahwahwah! And plos of into movings of unblockings me cuz i are of ballhogz breaked of waitings i are of cannot wait i need to wandolyze again and became da soopa perfect admin of wookapodayhah Bubble Dodlon (talk) 18:17, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Pure nonsense. Talk page access revoked. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 18:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.