User talk:Cannonbolt2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Cannonbolt2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --A NobodyMy talk 17:53, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Your request for rollback[edit]

Hi Cannonbolt2. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY (TALK) 04:42, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Cannonbolt2 (talk) 12:06, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Frgrfss comments[edit]

Please stop adding the aliens to the character's article. If you do this again, you will be blocked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frgrfss (talkcontribs) 14:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Child editors who don't care for the rules are far more likely to get blocked! ;) Cannonbolt2 (talk) 14:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Listen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I only did this because people wanted me to create a new page for the aliens Can't you see that it will help everyone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frgrfss (talkcontribs) 14:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank spam![edit]

Hello, Cannonbolt2. You have new messages at User:TFOWR/Thankspam.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TFOWR 21:33, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:00, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Cannonbolt2 (talk) 15:11, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:91.105.82.78[edit]

Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments says we shouldn't revert comment removal (or in this case) warning removal by said user from said users talk page, be it anonymous or registered :) Gsp8181 11:49, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thankfully that's just an essay and not policy. I personally believe warnings for clear and obvious vandals should always be restored for the convenience of users issuing further warnings and sysops issuing blocks. Cannonbolt2 (talk) 11:53, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting the page protected. Amidst the welter of image deletions on my talk page I missed your advice. Apologies. Quentin X (talk) 15:35, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lee[edit]

Yep, you're absolutely right. I didn't quite catch the initials on his shirt when watching the game. Quentin X (talk) 21:13, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing[edit]

Hi, your name came up several times giving me warnings about editing on an All Grown Up Wikipedia. I just wanted to let you know that my autistic brother likes that show and constantly goes on the wikipedia. I can't really moderate what he changes but if you'd like to block his ip from editing on that site it would be okay. Neither of us have wikipedia usernames so...yeah. 76.108.146.86 (talk) 02:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you or your brother continue vandalising Wikipedia, that includes adding incorrect information after being warned not too, your IP will be blocked from editing for a short while. Cannonbolt2 (talk) 11:13, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:29, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ben 10 Ultimate Aliens Episodes[edit]

I do belive that the schedule on the Ben 10 Ultimate Alien site at Cartoon Network as well as Dwayne main page says the next new episode is Ultimate Aggregor. That link to the question on the discussion page for the list of Ben 10 Ultimate Alien episodes asks if the next two episodes will be named "Ultimate Aggregor Part 1 and Ultimate Aggregor Part 2".P3771 (talk) 14:57, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on main article talk page. Cannonbolt2 (talk) 16:07, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have responded on the talk page as well. And again, I must apologize for my horribly written, tour guide like post.P3771 (talk) 04:57, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved

Cannonbolt2 (talk) 23:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]