User talk:Carolinasld

Welcome!

Hello, Carolinasld, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 20:31, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Ellen Pearson

A tag has been placed on Ellen Pearson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —C.Fred (talk) 20:31, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ann M. Scarlett[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ann M. Scarlett, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://law.slu.edu/faculty/profiles/profile.asp?username=ascarlet. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:20, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Supreme Court case lists[edit]

Thanks for linking to the existing articles. However, the term opinion lists follow how the Supreme Court itself displayed the case name (for example, see the Fitzgerald listing at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/08slipopinion.html), so I think the better practice might be to either leave the link in the term list as is and create a redirect from that to the article, or pipe the link in the term list so that it links directly to the article but displays as SCOTUS had listed the case. In any event, the redirect should always be created. Thanks for your help in this area. Cheers, postdlf (talk) 15:47, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ann M. Scarlett[edit]

The article Ann M. Scarlett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability criteria for academics, unresolved copyright issues.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]