User talk:Cfpcertified
Whoever is editing the American Academy of Financial Management article is adding defamatory content in there. I am familiar with CFA, CFP and AAFM and none of them offer diplomas or degrees, but some editor is stating that AAFM offers degrees which is wrong.
The AAFM article also contains criticism that has been debunked by the press and other organizations.
April 2013[edit]
Hello, Cfpcertified. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Certified Financial Planner, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- You need not declare your conflict of interest, but we recommend it.
- Do not edit articles about yourself, your organization, or your competitors. Do not edit related articles. (Exceptions.)
- Post suggestions and sources on the article's talk page, or create a draft in your user space.
- Your role is to summarize, inform and reference — not to promote, sell, or whitewash.
- If writing a draft, write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject.
- Have us review your draft.
- Work with us and we'll work with you.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at American Academy of Financial Management shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Famspear (talk) 16:51, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Cfpcertified, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]
|
Hi Cfpcertified! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Correcting Horrible Mistakes[edit]
The present article on AAFM is loaded with mistakes. Nobody has been permitted to fix the errors in the AAFM article for over 2 years. It seems that there is some type of COI issue?