User talk:Comeondowntothe

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Comeondowntothe! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!

Brookie :) { - like the mist - there one moment and then gone!} (Whisper...)

16:39, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your 'redirects'[edit]

Hi, I think there are problems with the many redirects you're creating; most of them aren't likely capitalizations or misspellings, and appear frivolous. Please read [1]. I may request further input on your edits. Thank you, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects[edit]

Please stop making all these redirects as they are unnecessary and is extremely tedious to tag all these for deletion, be deleted, etc, etc.

You may be blocked by an administrator if you keep this up. Thank you. Zhangj1079 (T|C) 18:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All or all of the redirects you created were completely pointless. Some of them were arbitrary collections of capital and non-capital letters in a form which it is highly unlikely that anyone would type in to search for an article, others had unnecessary disambiguation added to the end of an existing article title, and so on. The redirects have been deleted. If by any chance there were one or two among them which might have been useful, then it would have been better to just create those, which might have survived. It is unrealistic to expect anyone to search through 188 redirects on the off chance they might fond one worth keeping somewhere among them. If you genuinely thought that the redirects you were creating might be useful, then please don't create any more redirects until you have far more experience of editing Wikipedia, so that you know what is likely to be useful and what isn't. If, on the other hand, you didn't intend them to be useful, and were just playing around, then please don't, as it takes up time and work from editors who have to clean up after you, who could have better used the same time on more productive work. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comeondowntothe, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Comeondowntothe! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:11, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock.[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Comeondowntothe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet. Comeondowntothe (talk) 23:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Whether you are or not you are clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopaedia, and unblocking you would not benefit the project. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 23:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.