User talk:CurtisNaito

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, CurtisNaito, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dismas|(talk) 05:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

I do not think that a publication is reliable which is descrediting any person by calling him simply conspiracy theorist. That term is just always unfair and avoids arguing about details. No source is given at all in his article. As I described the offical conspiracy theories are often the most horrific.Spearmind (talk) 12:26, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Well, his association with conspiracy theories was noted by a significant number of peer-reviewed academic journals, and he himself has argued that all scholars studying the motives behind the 9/11 attacks are by definition conspiracy theorists. This makes him and everyone else studying the incident, by his definition, conspiracy theorists.CurtisNaito (talk) 17:25, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
You see I wanted to add other sources to this very one sided (as DISCUSSED already) article now Capitalismojo comes and deletes it saying "not notable". Furthermore Peake's book review was for the CIA, which I think is notable for the public same like the subject he currently teaches at his university is notable.Spearmind (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Nanking[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Nanking you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 -- Tomandjerry211 (talk) 18:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Nanking[edit]

The article Battle of Nanking you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Battle of Nanking for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 -- Tomandjerry211 (talk) 01:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)