User talk:DD0007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wanker, you will be blocked from editing. -- Alexf(talk) 11:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael Noack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to assert notability per WP:BIO. All sources are B2B company profile sites or company listings.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Noack for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Noack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Noack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Frickeg (talk) 07:12, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]