User talk:DogTraining01

December 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chibi Devi! without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edit removed several useful wikilinks. Belbury (talk) 13:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Windsor Castle (novel). Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. You've changed a direct quotation here, William Ainsworth did not use these words in the source cited. Belbury (talk) 16:22, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Galician Literature Day has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Poème (Chausson), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. The specific issue was your removal of the italics for the work's title (and working title) - it was correct how it was. Swadge2 (talk) 10:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Julie Benz, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 11:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Elizabeth Schrader Polczer. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 11:16, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jacksonville Symphony Youth Orchestra, you may be blocked from editing. You must provide an edit summary with each edit, as you have been repeatedly notified. Please review the basic "Learn to edit" materials linked here Help:Introduction and Help:Edit summary here. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 07:54, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Martin Anthamatten, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 13:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Street Pędzichów, Kraków. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 13:52, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make unexplained changes to information on Wikipedia, as you did at Albert Bogátradvány. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 14:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:EUPHEMISM[edit]

Please do not ever use words like "passing" as a euphemism for "death" in the encyclopedia, or any comparable euphemisms. Please do not refer to dead people as having "left behind" others, either. This is not negotiable. If you have any questions, please ask the editors at WP:TEAHOUSE for a second opinion. Thanks. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tone[edit]

Hi DogTraining01, I strongly urge you to stop your disruptive editing. You are consistently using a very inappropriate WP:TONE in your edits. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, so please use an encyclopedic tone. Not fluffy, ineffectual and filled with euphemisms. Any of your inappropriate edits will be reverted. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 11:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok,i am really sorry, i will not repeat DogTraining01 (talk) 11:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pattern of continuing disruption[edit]

All of your edits that I have seen consist of random changes to wording, substituting synonyms or paraphrases of one word for another, or one expression for another, without in any way improving the encyclopedia. For this reason, I have reverted your edits at:

Please stop making edits of this type, or you may have your editing privileges suspended. If you have questions about this, please reply below, or seek assistance at the Wikipedia:Help desk. Mathglot (talk) 10:54, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, I (or another editor) have removed your edits from the following articles, as pointless changes to wording of the same type as those above:

You appear to be not here to improve the encyclopeida. Please stop your disruptive changes immediately, or your editing privileges are likely to be suspended. Mathglot (talk) 11:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to the following articles have been removed by me, or another editor, for the same reason as above: making pointless changes to wording or word order:

Please stop these pointless changes immediately. Mathglot (talk) 12:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators Noticeboard discussion about your edits[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 13:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 14:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]