User talk:Doug Sacks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I put a fair use clause.


Image Tagging Image:Art Pepper.jpg[edit]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Art Pepper.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 22:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Steve 1.jpg[edit]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Steve 1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 13:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Art Pepper + Eleven – Modern Jazz Classics1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Lucky.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lucky.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigrTex 19:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Doug Sacks! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! THF 16:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

"Show preview"[edit]

Howdy! Have you tried the "Show preview" button when editing?

It makes this:

  1. (cur) (last) 05:54, 29 May 2008 Doug Sacks (Talk | contribs) (29,639 bytes) (→DVD releases) (undo)
  2. (cur) (last) 05:53, 29 May 2008 Doug Sacks (Talk | contribs) (29,641 bytes) (→DVD releases) (undo)
  3. (cur) (last) 05:52, 29 May 2008 Doug Sacks (Talk | contribs) (29,635 bytes) (→Season Six episodes are currently available to Netflix subscribers through their Instant Viewing program!) (undo)
  4. (cur) (last) 05:52, 29 May 2008 Doug Sacks (Talk | contribs) (29,637 bytes) (→Season Six episodes are currently available to Netflix subscribers through their Instant Viewing program!) (undo)
  5. (cur) (last) 05:51, 29 May 2008 Doug Sacks (Talk | contribs) (29,647 bytes) (→DVD releases) (undo)
  6. (cur) (last) 05:51, 29 May 2008 Doug Sacks (Talk | contribs) (29,645 bytes) (→Season Six episodes are currently available to Netflix subscribers through their Instant Viewing program!) (undo)
  7. (cur) (last) 05:50, 29 May 2008 Doug Sacks (Talk | contribs) (29,649 bytes) (→Season Six episodes are currently available to Netflix subscribers through their Instant Viewing program!) (undo)
  8. (cur) (last) 05:50, 29 May 2008 Doug Sacks (Talk | contribs) (29,651 bytes) (→DVD releases) (undo)
  9. (cur) (last) 05:47, 29 May 2008 Doug Sacks (Talk | contribs) (29,644 bytes) (→DVD releases) (undo)
  10. (cur) (last) 05:46, 29 May 2008 Doug Sacks (Talk | contribs) (29,640 bytes) (→DVD releases) (undo)
  11. (cur) (last) 05:45, 29 May 2008 Doug Sacks (Talk | contribs) (29,527 bytes) (→DVD releases) (undo)
  12. (cur) (last) 05:44, 29 May 2008 Doug Sacks (Talk | contribs) (29,641 bytes) (→DVD releases) (undo)


Look like this when you view the history tab:

  1. (cur) (last) 05:54, 29 May 2008 Doug Sacks (Talk | contribs) (29,639 bytes) (→DVD releases) (undo

Makes you look way more credible and cooler! ~ WikiDon (talk) 06:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spam[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Rockford Files. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

See: WP:SPAM

~ WikiDon (talk) 20:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Rockford Files. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Hi[edit]

Welcome. There are all kinds of people who come to WP for info. I am writing for the smart ones. :-) Steve Dufour (talk) 21:10, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Left-leaning"[edit]

Hi Doug, please do not add "politically left leaning" to describe Salon.com without further discussion on the Washington Times talk page. Your perception of the website's politics doesn't justify its inclusion in the sentence, and neither does calling the addition "objective," because it's clearly your opinion. Thanks!!Athene cunicularia (talk) 15:08, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:600250.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:600250.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:56, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File source problem with File:Proof Rockford Netflix.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Proof Rockford Netflix.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 17:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Proof Rockford Netflix.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Proof Rockford Netflix.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Salavat (talk) 17:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Doug Sacks. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]