User talk:Drnoble

AfC notification: Draft:Morlais has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Morlais. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morlais (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Morlais and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 00:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Drnoble! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 00:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing my draft. I've updated the article a bit, and asked for further guidance over at the teahouse. Drnoble (talk) 12:17, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morlais tidal power station has been accepted

Morlais tidal power station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

F.Alexsandr (talk) 10:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Tidal Power

Good idea. Not an expert, just interested. Visited Rance Tidal Power Station about 1985, did the tour. I think that they have problems with silt reducing capacity. BlueWren0123 (talk) 12:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

I found my copy of the green Guide Michelin for Bretagne Ed 1975 ISBN 2-06-100-150-5. It has a piece on Rance (Vallee de la) P156-157 including the Usine maremotrice de la Rance.BlueWren0123 (talk) 03:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Also https://arena.gov.au/knowledge-bank/tidal-energy-in-australia/. Good acronym, shame about lack of progress.BlueWren0123 (talk) 13:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nova Innovation has been accepted

Nova Innovation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Merry Christmas, and a happy new year)} 12:32, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing and accepting my draft, it makes me more confident to edit going forward. Hope you have a good festive break and all the best for the new year @ToadetteEdit Drnoble (talk) 12:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marine Current Turbines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Fraenkel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Drnoble. Thank you for your work on Aguçadoura test site. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)