User talk:Esvabird

October 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Utica College has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Utica College was changed by Esvabird (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918898 on 2020-10-10T23:02:01+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Death of Jeffrey L. Smith for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Jeffrey L. Smith, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Howard Liebengood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of H.R. 3325 (117th Congress) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article H.R. 3325 (117th Congress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H.R. 3325 (117th Congress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 06:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Esvabird! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:47, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution for public domain material[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Thom Tillis. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 18:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]