User talk:Goirick

Welcome!

Hello, Goirick, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Chris (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amyt Datta for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amyt Datta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amyt Datta until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk 17:47, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been restored (Goirick (talk) 06:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted Article[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I needed some help regarding an article of mine which was deleted early this year due to lack of notability. I now have two evidence of notability. was wondering if I can retrieve the article. Do guide me.Goirick (talk) 06:56, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Assuming you still know the name of those deleted articles, you can request that their contents be made available in your user space. Check WP:USERFY for more information. I would recommend to you that you don't just re-create the article after that, and go through the AFC process instead. Hope that helps. Cheers! ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 07:10, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know the name of the article but cannot locate it in the deletion review. The article has been blanked out. Thanks Twsx. Let me check WP:USERFY Goirick (talk) 07:13, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article in question is The Four Quarters Magazine. You will have to go through deletion review if you want to have the page restored. The two sources you gave ([1], [2]) are helpful, but they aren't really enough to show a depth of coverage. Of the sources given at AfD, none were really enough to show that the magazine would pass notability guidelines. I just don't really see where the two new sources are enough to firmly establish notability and overturn the AfD consensus. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:20, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tokyogirl79 . To firmly establish notability and overturn the AfD consensus, a article must be backed by third party unbiased sources,that is exactly what this two sources are doing I suppose.Specifically [3]), which talks about the magazine, while the other one is about an event organised by four quarters magazine. If not, please do let me know where they are missing.Will wait for your suggestions. Goirick (talk) 10:39, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Amyt Dutta1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Amyt Dutta1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. XXN, 17:18, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]