User talk:Just a guy from the KP

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Just a guy from the KP! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 09:53, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Thank You[edit]

Thank you very much for the message or lessons, for they are really lessons for me. Because I am new to the Wikipedia in creating Articles. I have to learn a lot from it to contribute qualitative and quantitative articles. And so thank you very much for the links sent to me. Peter Thomas 13:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olickal Peter Thomas (talkcontribs)

A Small Doubt[edit]

Dear Just a guy from the KP, I am wondered that somebody can divert a written article in their authenticity or Page Creator due to a small change of a spelling! How good enough, why wouldn't you mention the same in my talk page, brother? Olickal Peter Thomas (talkcontribs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.235.51.130 (talk) 07:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi @Olickal Peter Thomas:. I'm not sure what you're asking, or trying to say. I've been fixing typos (especially improper units of measurement) by searching for common typos (e.g. k.m. or kms, which should be km or kilometres). I also fix grammatical errors, dead links, etc. when I notice them. This doesn't change the Page Creator of those articles, and I hope my work is improving those articles. Hope that helps! Just a guy from the KP (talk) 02:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you![edit]

Thank you for correcting k.m. into km in so many pages of South India. Regards, Prof TPMS (talk) 15:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
:) Archana Venur (talk) 09:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SMILE![edit]

sic[edit]

Hi, Please note MOS:PMC: "However, trivial spelling and typographic errors should simply be corrected without comment (for example, correct basicly to basically and harasssment to harassment), unless the slip is textually important." For example, "amd" should almost always be just changed to "and" rather than "amd [sic]" even if the original document has this trivial typo. Cheers. Zerotalk 08:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Zero, thank you for pointing out that section of the MOS. I reviewed the MOS back when I started editing, but there's a lot to take in. I guess I need to take some time to review it again! Just a guy from the KP (talk) 15:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Upto[edit]

Hi, is this really necessary? The cite has been copied to numerous articles but my copy of the actual book says up to anyway. Googling it shows both spellings but you need to bear in mind that the articles you are editing are written using Indian English and both forms are valid. - Sitush (talk) 17:12, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I think you are going to have to revert an awful lot of your recent edits for that reason, ie: WP:MOSTIES. - Sitush (talk) 17:13, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Sitush. I wasn't aware that upto was an accepted spelling in Indian English. After some Google searches (both before I started my edits, and after receiving your message), I couldn't find anyone who says upto is a valid spelling. In the case of the article you mentioned, I had searched for the book name and according to Google Books the spelling in the title is "upto", so I added the [sic]. In the recent cases where I've added [sic] for upto, I did so to recognize that it was misspelled (as I understood) but was spelled that way in a book title or article title. Just a guy from the KP (talk) 18:56, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you did not Google well or far enough? Eg: by far the most reliable newspaper in India and here, a mainstream book publisher. In any event, don't you think it is a bit specious - I could go round putting [sic] against every use of color or defense but I realise that it is a valid spelling in some parts of the world. - Sitush (talk) 21:50, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sitush, I guess I was thinking of dictionary entries, not newspaper articles. I've found entries for color/colour and defense/defence in every dictionary I've checked, but I don't see entries for upto (except, ironically, in Wiktionary).
At the end of the day, I assume we both want to do what's best, and in this case I will defer to your knowledge of English in India. I will revert all of the [sic] entries for the word upto I've made over the past couple days. Just a guy from the KP (talk) 02:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

kp[edit]

hi there, thanks for your work on india related articles.... but i m wondering what does "KP" stand for in User:Just a guy from the KP?? --Adamstraw99 (talk) 18:38, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Adamstraw99, I'm glad to help wherever and whenever I can.
"The KP" is a nickname for my hometown. When I needed a user name for Wikipedia, that was the first thing that popped into my head. I'm nobody important, I'm Just a guy from the KP (talk) 00:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Wikipedian[edit]

Hello! I found you in the page history of Madagascar, was struck by your username, and saw that you used to be a regular but have not edited in some time. I have added you to Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians; if you want, feel free to remove yourself. Thank you for your contributions to the project, I hope you are well, and God bless you! Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]