User talk:Kanoboom03

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm E. Ripley. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sanctuary of Loyola— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — e. ripley\^talk 03:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sanctuary of Loyola with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —Frosty ☃ 03:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Report generator with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Teotlalco, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Teotlalco was changed by Kanoboom03 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950081 on 2014-11-03T03:08:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dreadstar ☥ 03:18, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]