User talk:LDas12345

Welcome![edit]

Hi LDas12345! I noticed your contributions to Bromley and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 14:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm JeffSpaceman. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Honor killing have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 22:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Honor killings by region, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 16:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of programmes broadcast by CBeebies, you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 16:30, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Honor killings. Please supply references for the information you add on disability. Tacyarg (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Walthamstow shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries on your edits. Please also make use of the talk pages rather than simply redoing edits you have been reverted on. I count 84 of your edits that have been reverted out of 136 total. It is clear that there is some issue. We want to give new editors space to learn and develop, and I'd be happy to help you with that. But the first thing you need to do is actually talk to us. Thanks. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 11:25, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Prevalence of female genital mutilation. NebY (talk) 22:56, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Honor killing. There is nothing about disability as a motive for these murders in the references given. Can you not find a source for the point about disability? Please do not add material which is unsourced. Tacyarg (talk) 19:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is LDas12345 - POV editing and refusal to talk. Thank you.

January 2024[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm NebY. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Babak Khorramdin (director), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NebY (talk) 18:33, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 07:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you even thought to make this edit, along with your other block and the warnings above, leads me to believe the you lack the maturity to edit constructively here. Graham87 (talk) 07:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]