User talk:Luc.patry

December 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Monty Hall problem, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 17:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey why do you censure me ?Luc.patry (talk) 05:43, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The message was a standard warning message to advise users of the prohibition against original research. It is a tool for you to grow as an editor more than a statement of disapproval.

Obviously, if an editor were to persist in making inappropriate edits and not pay heed to warnings they receive, it would become necessary to sanction the editor, usually by blocking their account and restricting them from editing some or all of the project's pages. —C.Fred (talk) 15:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luc.patry@gmail.com (February 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by C.Fred was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No evidence that the subject of the article is in any way significant or encyclopedic. The only source cited is an undescribed YouTube video.

—C.Fred (talk) 04:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luc.patry! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —C.Fred (talk) 04:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Luc.patry, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]