User talk:MarsBarLover

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MarsBarLover, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi MarsBarLover! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 00:55, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:50, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to French language may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Esther Hart (Titanic survivor)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Esther Hart (Titanic survivor), MarsBarLover!

Wikipedia editor Jackson Peebles just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I added two references. Please add references at the time of creation, if possible, and it might benefit from more, too. I also recommend adding categories.

To reply, leave a comment on Jackson Peebles's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello, MarsBarLover. You have changed the French-speaking population figure three times now: [1][2][3]. The first time, you replaced the sourced figure of 220 million with an unsourced figure of 290 million. The subsequent two times, in addition to making that change you also replaced what appears to be a reliable source, Organisation Internationale de La Francophonie, with a figure sourced to a website, www.forvo.com, whose content is at least partly user-sourced, and you did so without explanation. This is a problem on two levels. First, the substantive: the change represents an increase of nearly one-third, which is highly suspect in and of itself and cannot reasonably be accepted without a logical rationale. Second, the procedural: when making a change of this sort, it is unacceptable to keep simply bludgeoning your preferred version onto the wiki; you need to explain what you're doing (see WP:BRD for good advice on how to go about this). I have no idea which is the correct figure, but I question the reliability of the forvo.com source and have posted a query at the reliable sources noticeboard. However it turns out, please avoid edit warring. Talk pages are there for a reason, and it's incumbent upon those of us inserting new content to use them. Thanks. Rivertorch (talk) 05:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia and Organisation Internationale de La Francophonie, French speakers will reach 500 million by 2025. I calculated that if that were to happen the number of French speakers would have to increase by (roughly) 100 million each four years if French is going to reach 500 million speakers in just 12 years. So, surely, if there were 220 million speakers in 2010 this number would have to have increased by roughly 70 milllion by 2013. So couldn't this the estimated 290 million speakers (according to forvo.com) be possible? MarsBarLover 16:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

There's something wrong with your figures, but never mind. We do not base population figures on extrapolations of this kind; we go with what the most reliable sources say. I wish you'd undo your edit. Rivertorch (talk) 18:38, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]