User talk:Nazgul02

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Vítej! / Welcome!

Hello, Nazgul02, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! - Darwinek (talk) 17:55, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Burning Bush (mini-series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conductor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Charlemagne: By the Sword and the Cross[edit]

Hey, I undid your removal of sources from Charlemagne: By the Sword and the Cross. If you think there's a problem with any of the sources (you called them "irrelevant", but that doesn't really mean all that much), bring it up on the article's talk page so we can figure out a better solution than just removing them and replacing with cite needed tags. There didn't appear to be any issues from what I could see, however I didn't look too hard at the sources, so I may have missed whatever the issues were. Thanks! MrMoustacheMM (talk) 21:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi MrMoustacheMM, I think you should've taken a deeper look at the removed sources. One link is dead, the others are about Charlemagne but not about the album. Dead links should not be included in Wikipedia, nor references which have nothing to do with the subject they should prove. Nazgul02 (talk) 22:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Alright, thanks for the explanation. I didn't check them, because your edit summary was lacking in any real info explaining why you removed these sources (in other words, it didn't seem like you had a good reason; "irrelevant" is hardly descriptive, and dead links should not be summarily removed without first using Template:Dead link to mark them as dead). I assume you checked for an archived version of the dead link, and could not find one? If not, please do so, as we should not remove sources simply because the current link is dead (archived versions of sources are perfectly fine for WP). If you do find an archived version, check Template:Cite web on how to show archived links. Again, thanks for the explanation! MrMoustacheMM (talk) 23:19, 29 April 2014 (UTC)