User talk:PingerNg

Welcome![edit]

Hello, PingerNg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited was Draft:Nathan Allen Pirtle, which appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kleuske (talk) 08:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's not about myself PingerNg (talk) 08:42, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 14:48, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MER-C, The block is a huge shock and surprising to me, I have not in any way advertised on Wikipedia or violated conflict of interest, Your blocking me is against Wikipedia's blocking policy and the actions leveled against me are very inaccurate. There has been no form of advertising or self-promoting engaded. I plead to be unblocked. There have been different edits made by me on Wikipedia solely to the publics interest and not for my personal gains, you may review all my edits. The block has nothing to do with me and I request humbly for the block to be reversed. Thank you very much as you comply. PingerNg (talk) 13:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PingerNg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello MER-C, The block is a huge shock and surprising to me, I have not in any way advertised on Wikipedia or violated conflict of interest, Your blocking me is against Wikipedia's blocking policy and the actions leveled against me are very inaccurate. There has been no form of advertising or self-promoting engaded. I plead to be unblocked. There have been different edits made by me on Wikipedia solely to the publics interest and not for my personal gains, you may review all my edits. The block has nothing to do with me and I request humbly for the block to be reversed, Hence if the blocking reasons may be stated clear to me I will avoid to make any edit of the sort over time. I also plead vehemently that if I'm pardoned and I desist from the warning, I should be blocked once again. Thank you very much as you comply PingerNg (talk) 12:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Editing "solely to the publics interest" is a form of promotion. Wikipedia is not for merely telling the public about things. You'll need to better explain any connection you have with the subjects you have written about. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PingerNg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, But the subjects I've written about are of notable impacts and not solely for the public's interest. I read the Help: Your First article exclusively before starting to edit. The various articles I've created are not in anyway to the gain of any particular entity neither do I have any connections with them. I do not know how else to explain but I've read Wikipedia's guidelines and policies and I'm sure I have not contradicted to their rules in anyway. The only connection I can tell of us that I'm Nigerian and I have interests in subjects that concern politics, government, music and culture. That is why the various articles I've created are connected to these subjects in some ways. The second is that I love creating the articles cause it builds my editing skills too as a wikipedian so I create articles about interested subjects voluntarily. Please grant my request

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 13:07, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PingerNg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, Thank you for the block cause I now understand what I have been blocked for and more enlightened on Wikipedia's guidelines and policies , Hence I'll no longer cause disruption but continue the useful edits and contributions. The block is no longer necessary I assure you.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:18, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PingerNg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've sincerely pledged that I won't make any edits contrary to Wikipedia's policies and I've accepted the previous block in good faith, Why do you then still decline my request. I plead to be unblocked cause I think it's no longer used as a correction but as an imperial punishment. I assure you that the block is no longer necessary please PingerNg (talk) 17:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:26, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This unblock request is pointless. Are you sure you've answered the questions we asked? Are you sure you have read, understood, and followed WP:GAB? Can you please specify where you addressed your abuse of Wikipedia for spam/promotion, because I don't see it. If you are unable or unwilling to address the reason for your block, we'll revoke your talk page access to prevent you wasting any more of our time. --Yamla (talk) 20:18, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PingerNg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can't find anywhere I've engaged in spam/promotion, You totally misunderstood me. I've not promoted in any way. I don't know why I was blocked, I'm just pledging not to make any disruptive edits in the future PingerNg (talk) 03:19, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:26, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@MER-C: PingerNg (talk) 03:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems you think I engaged in promotional edits by creating the page Nathan Allen Pirtle. I apologise for doing so and plead to the administrators to heed my requests cause I've learnt my lesson as the block is no longer necessary. PingerNg (talk) 16:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PingerNg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

=Seems you think I engaged in promotional edits by creating the page Nathan Allen Pirtle. I apologise for doing so and plead to the administrators to heed my requests cause I've learnt my lesson as the block is no longer necessary. I've understood why I've been blocked, will not make disruptive edits again rather continue making useful contributions instead. As for the articles I've created about, I have no direct connection with them. I created them because I felt they'd be useful to Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 13:14, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kida Kudz moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Kida Kudz, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 04:57, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kida Kudz[edit]

Hello, PingerNg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kida Kudz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nathan Allen Pirtle[edit]

Hello, PingerNg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nathan Allen Pirtle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]