User talk:Praze02

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Spf121188. An edit that you recently made to Daily Politics seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 13:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's so nice meeting you spf
Am actually new to editing on wikipedia
Do am very sorry for any mistake I made during my edits
We live to learn Praze02 (talk) 10:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Gerard Blasius, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Feline Hymnic (talk) 09:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Obafemi Awolowo University massacre. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Feline Hymnic (talk) 10:03, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this was vandalism. It looks to me like it's simply a newer editor who hasn't figured everything out yet. valereee (talk) 15:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks ma'am for this
Am actually a new editor and am just trying to know more about the rules behind editing Praze02 (talk) 10:09, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Praze02, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Valereee (talk) 11:34, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Fried Plantain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

New, unsourced article by new user whose edits are mostly problematical.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Feline Hymnic (talk) 10:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have redirected this article to the already-existing one at Fried plantain. valereee (talk) 15:11, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Omoyele Sowore, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted a lot more of your edits. Please see Wikipedia:External links and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Omoyele Sowore, you may be blocked from editing. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 23:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'd check my wrongs and correct them and I promise not to make any damages to articles further More. I am a new editor willing to learn and I'd appreciate if you can point out areas to correct rather than block me Praze02 (talk) 21:39, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly unblock me from editing, I promise not to make disruptive edits anymore. Thanks for understanding Praze02 (talk) 11:19, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Monalisa Chi[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Monalisa Chi. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Monalisa Chinda. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Monalisa Chinda. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Storchy (talk) 11:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ebuka Obi-Uchendu. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. luis. 💬 23:57, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nenny B, you may be blocked from editing. luis. 💬 00:00, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mustapha Njie. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 00:10, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let us try again[edit]

👋 Hello, Praze02, I am Mako001, you may remember that I reverted many of your edits a couple of days ago.

Since then, you have nearly been blocked, because editors thought that your edits were vandalism. I don't think that your edits are vandalism. However, I do think that there are some issues with your editing. If you want to continue editing here, you need to fix these issues

  • Second: Be careful when adding or changing text. Here you deleted a citation when you changed the page. You should not do that.
  • Third: Be careful with line breaks. Here you added several in the middle of a sentence. This is a problem.

If you can start by fixing up these issues, then we can continue to work on making sure your editing is helping the encyclopedia. I hope to hear back soon, and please don't edit articles until you have answered here. If you aren't sure about what I am saying, let me know, and I will try to explain. 🙂 Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 02:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I discovered most of my edits were reverted, I am actually new to editing and since I have been editng articles u have only sent threatening words to block me from editing rather encouraging me and helping me correct areas where I committed errors. Anyway I am glad you have understood the situation and I'd say I now understand the parts you are correcting me about, but I'd be glad if u can still expantiate more Praze02 (talk) 08:25, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please, don't block me from editing I am begging you to rather correct my errors Praze02 (talk) 08:29, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~Hi, I am a new editor and I have been trying to learn the rules guiding editing an article, so far so good I have been able to lean a lot of things so far but at this junction, I'd say I am so sorry for causing damages to articles and I plead to be unblocked with which I promise not to make damaging edits anymore, rather than block me from editing , why not correct the article I damaged and alert me. Thanks for understanding please kindly unblock me, I promise not to make disruptive edits anymore ~~~}}.  SuperMarioMan (Talk) 20:20, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @SuperMarioMan
Thank you for initiating the block, I have been able to learn how to edit and I have worked on my editing skill.
My community leaders have put me through a series of training for the past 5months which I can boldly say it has helped me improve on editing skill.
I would appreciate it if you can give me another opportunity to continue editing on Wikipedia.
Thank you for the consideration.
Praze02 (talk) 10:31, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Teju Babyface. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:29, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SuperMarioMan: unfortunately it seems the temporary block hasn't had the desired effect. I have just reverted, or manually undone, almost all of Praze02's edits that they've made since the block expired. This was because they have continued to add unsourced material to biographies. Their edits have also left typos, and as they've mostly edited lead sections, they need to understand that "significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article". Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Curb Safe Charmer
Thank you for initiating the block, I have been able to learn how to edit and I have worked on my editing skill.
My community leaders have put me through a series of training for the past 5months which I can boldly say it has helped me improve on editing skill.
I would appreciate it if you can give me another opportunity to continue editing on Wikipedia. Praze02 (talk) 21:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SuperMarioMan (Talk) 21:37, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hii, it’s being more than a year since I have been blocked. Please what can I do to get my account back Praze02 (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:47, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now as to the " trainings, seminars and workshops ," I'd be interested in who offered those. You don't need all that to provide a WP:reliable source for edits you make. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exemption[edit]

I have granted you IP block exemption for one week on the off chance an underlying IP block is preventing you from posting an unblock request here. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
I have been blocked for more than a year, please what can I do to resolve this ? Praze02 (talk) 09:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you were blocked for "persistent addition of unsourced, ungrammatical, or otherwise unconstructive content on biographical articles." Please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
Please fill in "your reason here," by concisely and clearly describing what you did to be blocked, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you'd make. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was blocked for adding unsourced and unconstructive content on articles persistently which I would blame on ignorance. Nevertheless, I am sure I can now make sourced and constructive edits as I joined the Wir anglophone community/African Wikipedia alliance.from the community, I learnt a lot concerning editing Wikipedia and wiki data. Proper citations. Ensuring neutral point of view, proper verifiability of my contents. I thereby appeal that I be unblocked and I will make proper constructive edits henceforth.
thanks in advance Praze02 (talk) 08:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was blocked for adding unsourced and unconstructive content on articles persistently which I would blame on ignorance. Nevertheless, I am sure I can now make sourced and constructive edits as I joined the Wir anglophone community/African Wikipedia alliance.from the community, I learnt a lot concerning editing Wikipedia and wiki data. Proper citations. Ensuring neutral point of view, proper verifiability of my contents. I thereby appeal that I be unblocked and I will make proper constructive edits henceforth.
thanks in advance Praze02 (talk) 18:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]