User talk:RajmataMB

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, RajmataMB! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:RajmataMB/sandbox has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:RajmataMB/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:RajmataMB/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RajmataMB (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Administrators,

I am writing to appeal the indefinite block placed on my account, RajmataMB, on Jan 24, 2024. I understand the reason for the block, which is due to edits deemed to be for promotional or advertising purposes.

I want to sincerely apologize for any edits that may have violated Wikipedia's policies on self-promotion and advertising. Please excuse me as this was the first page I created and I want to assure you that it was never my intention. I assure you that it will not happen again.

I understand and deeply regret that my previous edits were used for promotional purposes, which is a violation of Wikipedia's policies. I apologize for any inconvenience this caused to the community and the disruption I may have created.

Since receiving the block, I have carefully reviewed Wikipedia's policies, specifically the guidelines on neutrality and non-promotion. I understand that the primary aim of Wikipedia is to provide factual and unbiased information, and I am committed to contributing in a way that aligns with this goal.

To further demonstrate my understanding and commitment, I have already begun researching topics of genuine interest that I can contribute to in a neutral and informative manner.

I sincerely hope that the block can be lifted, allowing me to contribute as a responsible editor. I am confident that I can learn from this mistake and be a valuable asset to the Wikipedia community.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia in a positive and meaningful way.

Decline reason:

Chatbot written requests are not accepted. We want to hear from you, not an AI. Please write a request in your own words, and specifically speak to your block and what you will do differently. See the unblock appeals guide. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.