User talk:Redfern7

November 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Salva Mea because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rsrikath05, I am sorry to hear that you thought that the edit I made to the Salva Mea page did not appear to be constructive- the reason I made the edit was that mention was made of an incorrect use of Latin, so I stated what the correct Latin was.

What I don't think was fair was that in the comments on the revision you made, you suggested that what I wrote was "identified as test/vandalism"- it certainly wasn't a test, an how in earth could it be itentified as being "vandalism"? It's one thing to have a difference in opinion on what is relevant to put on a Wikipedia page, but how could what I wrote be seen to be vandalism? Redfern7 (talk) 16:21, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what you added didn't have a source, so I undid it. As for being tagged as vandalism, I was using an automated Tool Stiki, which appends the specified edit summary. Thanks for understanding. If you need further help let me know. Right now, I'll try and reword and fit that statement with a source. Cheers, and Happy Editing. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:30, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your replies and for your support Rsrikanth05, I very much appreciate you taking the time to say what you said- I can see that you have made a huge number of contributions to Wikipedia, so you clearly know what you are talking about!

And thank you for those cookies! Redfern7 (talk) 19:26, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Redfern7! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rsrikanth05 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have just logged in for the first time in a long while, and don't understand why I am blocked... Redfern7 (talk) 04:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Redfern7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

no reason for being blocked

Decline reason:

Yes there is. It's given in your block message.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yamla (talk) 13:28, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"May be used abusively"? That's my point - I haven't - could you be more specific? Redfern7 (talk) 22:17, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]