User talk:Sevencraft

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Sevencraft! I am Mysdaao and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Mysdaao ^talk 12:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Peter Zed has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): (?<![^\s:])[^\s\]\[\{\}\\\|^\/`<>@:]+@\w+(?!\.htm)(?:\.\w+){1,3} (links: 'wendylamport@gmail.com). It appears that you inserted an e-mail address to Peter Zed. Wikipedia pages should not contain personal information. For more information, please read Wikipedia:Biography of Living People, specifically the section about personal information.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Peter Zed do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://osfrjournal.blogspot.com/). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Peter Zed[edit]

A tag has been placed on Peter Zed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bevinbell (talk) 05:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

I have added back the COI template to the Peter Zed article. As I've mentioned on the talk page, if you are not Peter Zed and don't belong to an instituion related to him, how come your username and his email address are the same? Laurent (talk) 19:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

General note: Page blanking, removal of content on Talk:Peter Zed[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:Peter Zed. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Laurent (talk) 20:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Participation on AfD discussion pages[edit]

In general, people post one comment summing up their opinion on a discussion page. Excessive comments make the discussion confusing to read, and, in general, create a bad impression of the editor writing them. If the person in question is indeed notable, then other editors will see that based on the sources you've added; everyone wants to find a reason to vote "keep." -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:05, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

that's not what the guidelines say. They strictly point out that users who post are replied to in the format of multiple ****'s. Sevencraft (talk) 23:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to ignore my advice, of course. I base it merely on years of experience participating in such discussions, and my observations of effective and ineffective techniques. Many comments is a technique that is usually ineffective, especially if none of them contain the sources that would allow other users to vote 'keep.' One comment, clearly linking to two or three reliable sources clearly establishing notability, is almost always effective. And occasionally, a user whose participating in a discussion is particularly disruptive will be blocked until the discussion concludes so that other editors can concentrate on the discussion more effectively. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for account is shared by multiple users. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sevencraft (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:FisherQueen, Ugh, what kind of fool do you take me for? Im a solitary poster like every other wikigeek. its clear by my last three posts that I was messing around. Did you not catch the drift of my tone? Other users began poking fun so I began to play along... Unblock me so i can delete the page myself from wikipedia and complete the entire process. I was not aware creating a random joke about having a split personality would result in your harsh reaction. Unblock, please. You caught my last edit in between pages on the aFd page.Sevencraft (talk) 01:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no reason why I should believe you that was a joke. Also, you appear to be a not very constructive WP:SPA at any rate. Sandstein 09:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion of Dipnote[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dipnote requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Russavia ^Dialogue 14:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Derek Burgan[edit]

I have nominated Derek Burgan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Burgan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 19:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of YNOT News[edit]

I have nominated YNOT News, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YNOT News. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:15, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sevencraft for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:30, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Adult industry[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Adult industry, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Adult industry and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Adult industry during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Adult industry[edit]

Template:Adult industry has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vyper Fight League[edit]

The article Vyper Fight League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable now-defunct MMA promotion. No independent sources given to demonstrate lasting significance.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 04:24, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]